Public Speaking: Everything you should NOT do…In one single speech…

Every year, the President of the European Commission presents his speech on the state of the Union. Year after year, this speech offers a compilation of everything that should not be done when speaking in public.

Let’s take advantage of it to revise the 5 canons of rhetoric: invention, arrangement, style, memory and performance.

Invention

Invention is the stage where the speaker collects the material of his speech. The question one should then have in mind is: what should I say given the situation, the audience and the time constraints?

In this case, Jean-Claude Juncker speaks in a Europe in crisis (terrorism, Brexit, massive influx of migrants, the rise of populism and Euro-skepticism). He addressed these problems pretty well. He even took a stand on sensitive issues (he notably condemned the authoritarian drift in Turkey and advocated for a UE president with a more executive role).

That said, those few brave statements are drowned in a flow of facts, proposals and results without interest to the general public. Was this really the time and place to showcase the virtues of the “new EU framework for investment review” or to announce the opening of trade negotiations with Australia and New Zealand?

Disposition

Disposition is the stage of organization of the discourse. One should then think strategically: how to maximize the impact? Of course, the arrangement must go hand in hand with the performance of the speaker: pitch, tone and rhythm help to make the best out of the parts of the speech. On this aspect, things go wrong…

Admittedly, Juncker seems to have incorporated the function of the introduction: “When I appeared before you last year at the same time, my task was, in a way, easier.” These words instill gravity and you want to know more.

Similarly, he closes his discourse with a paradeigma, the rhetorical figure that consists in using a historical precedent to guide action in the present:

“Europe is not doomed to stagnation. She must refuse it. Helmut Kohl and Jacques Delors have taught me that Europe only advances when it is daring. Before becoming a reality, the single market, the Schengen area and the single currency were seen as mere mental views.”

The serious problem does not come either from the introduction or from the conclusion. It is between the two that things go wrong: it is so bushy, so monotone that I had to read the transcription to understand the structure. If a student does that to me, it’s zero.

Style

Style is a fundamental element of the oral speech. One must understand that style, in rhetoric, is not about sounding pretty. It is through style that we can truly create an event, going beyond the informative function of discourse to federate, exalt or dispose to action. Let us see an example of Mr. Juncker’s lack of style.

We are in the part of the speech that deals with the values of the Union:

“For me, Europe is a bigger project than the single market, the currency, the euro. It has always been a question of values.”

Absolutely, I am convinced, I am about to cheer.

“Europe must be a union of equality.”

Absolutely! Tell us more!

“The Slovaks do not deserve to have less fish in their fishsticks, the Hungarians less meat in their meals, or the Czechs less cocoa in their chocolate”

Are you kidding me? Is that all that you found Jean-Claude? Equality before breaded fish and cocoa? Yet you had a choice, Jean-Claude, you had an ocean of rhetorical possibilities. This choice reveals you as a speaker.

Memory

Concretely, a good orator should have a sufficient command of his material to focus on the audience rather than on the text.

Capture d’écran 2017-10-16 à 11.31.14

On this point, Juncker gives us a very good example of « I read my speech but I glance every three seconds at the room to make it more interactive. »

You should be ashamed of Jean-Claude.

Performance

Performance, finally, is the most important canon. Keep this in mind: a speaker who has not prepared anything but who offers his audience a good time fills his role a thousand times better than a speaker who annoys everyone by reading a magnificently prepared speech.

Jean-Claude Juncker speaks while asleep. Literally. This could be funny but, in truth, it’s sad. Take two seconds to picture the grotesque of the situation: a man gathers important people, in a prestigious place, on a given date, to deliver a speech. However, when the time comes, he does not provide any added value compared to the individual reading of a written document. These people deserve better than that. We deserve better than that.

For, ultimately, what are we talking about? We are talking about one of the most beautiful project in the history of mankind. I weigh my words. We are talking about a political project that, until very recently, has replaced poverty by wealth, arbitrariness by law, war by peace. Our Union deserves a better speech. Next time, get some help!

Articles similaires

Venez, on sauve la démoc... Depuis 2013, j’interviens dans les collèges et les lycées pour développer les compétences citoyennes des élèves. J’ai commencé ce travail à la suite d’une révélation : nous
Macron: on lui donne une ... Depuis trop longtemps, les professionnels de la politique occupent l’espace public avec des phrases vides et des idées creuses. Il est temps de leur donner une leçon.
Ce qui manque aux europé... Vous sentez que l’Europe manque de vitalité ? Vous percevez une morosité, un cynisme qui empoisonne l’esprit et le cœur des européens ? Vous en venez parfois à penser
Qu’est-ce que le re... Le relativisme est un refus d’assumer un jugement moral. C’est aussi l’attitude par défaut de beaucoup d’européens aujourd’hui. Comment en sommes-nous arrivés là ? Que faut-il garder du
Les 3 principes de la com... Comme vous le savez, l’expertise de Rhetorical Craft est la communication sur les sujets sensibles et dans les situations difficiles. En voici une: trouver les mots justes
Les indispensables (1): s... L’ouvrage Dialogue de sourds (2008) de Marc Angenot nous confronte à la plus grande inquiétude du spécialiste en communication : avons-nous vraiment le pouvoir de convaincre ? De quoi
Pourquoi il ne faut jamai... Dans son discours du 19 septembre 2017 à l’assemblée générale des Nations Unies, le président Trump a alterné entre le bon et le trop mauvais pour que
Discours de Macron au Con... Le lundi 9 juillet 2018, Emmanuel Macron s’est adressé aux parlementaires et aux sénateurs réunis en “Congrès” à Versailles. Ce discours est un objet rhétorique fascinant. Il
Qu’est-ce que le bu... J’ai compris le vrai sens du mot BULLSHIT: ça risque de changer votre perception des réseaux sociaux.   La première étape est de distinguer le bullshit du
Un bel exemple de sophism...   Connaissez-vous l’argument « ad baculum » ? Il consiste à persuader un opposant de renoncer à une thèse en soulignant les conséquences fâcheuses auxquelles il s’exposerait

Laisser une réponse

Votre adresse de messagerie ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *